A Review Of case laws on bail
A Review Of case laws on bail
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
4. Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in Individuals cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is susceptible to repeating the offence.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and because only the appellants were posted for the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused tried to take advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image with the petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and manufactured photos. Besides, the images shown to the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos in the accused publically, possibly by showing the same to your witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or software, would create doubt in the proceedings in the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to ensure that there is not any opportunity with the witness to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown for the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for that accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
Upholding Justice: The application in the regulation and the subsequent punishment in the guilty party offer a perception of closure and justice towards the target’s family and loved types.
department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs from the concerned officer to DPC effectively in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that permits callers to acquire primary case information through a touchtone phone. This is free check here to implement and accessible 24 hours on a daily basis.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for instance self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may perhaps result in reduced charges or acquittal.
3. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and making sure that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.